Come Fly With Me, the tribute to Frank Sinatra I saw last night, was...interesting. They called it a musical, but really it was more like the ballet in that there was no scripted dialog. Dancers may have shouted words once in awhile, but it wasn’t really for the audience to audibly understand, it was just more for the effect.
As the curtain rose and the trumpets blasted the first notes, my excitement swelled as I discovered the dancers on stage in the only scene there was for the whole play: the interior of a bar. The live orchestra was actually located at the back of the scene, in a bandstand sort of like what would have been back in the crooning days of Sinatra. My husband pointed out Greg Coile, trumpet #3, an acquaintance of ours that we always look for whenever there is a live band. Ah, so they hired quality musicians...I knew I was in for a treat as far as the music was concerned. I was not disappointed, except that it was intermittently but consistently too loud.
The plot line was simple really: in celebrating Sinatra’s music, Twyla Tharp used 31 of his songs and combined the lyrics with dance to guide the audience through the lives of about 20 people. We saw their ups and downs, falling in and out of love, their struggles and triumphs in life, all emotions included. It was Sinatra’s vocals they piped in over the live music, and the dancers described their characters through movement and pantomime. This innovative concept was powerful and well executed for the most part by Tharp, both in the pace of the story line and the general choreography.
The only part that I have to criticize, which is unfortunately huge, is the “sex” scene. Compared to Act 1, which was rated PG, and VERY tasteful and high class, enough for me to want to bring my young teenage children to see, Act 2 was clearly rated R! So much for bringing my children to see the fantastic dancing! Tharp decided that the dancers striping down to their skivvies on stage, and couples paired off writhing around on the stage in more than suggestive movements, was appropriate. NOT! With this one song, Tharp instantaneously made the show into soft porn. I was devastated. I felt my upper lip curl in disgust. The dancing could have been kept high class and tasteful and still conveyed the nature of the scene which was about how each couple physically showed their love for one another. My opinion of this show, created by such an “experienced choreographer”, was immediately lowered, to the point that the only reason I will say the show was redeemable was the great music and great dancing. Despite the terrible “shock value” choice on Tharp’s part, the orchestra, which by the way had a female vocal soloist intermittently, was overwhelmingly fantastic and the dancing superb quality.
As for the dancers, they were clearly excellently chosen for their parts. Hands down, the best and most animated was the bald bar tender. I particularly enjoyed his stage business when he wasn’t dancing. He took great care in tending the bar, with no props but the air. He did it so well, that I recognized the objects he was carrying around and handing people, etc. However, his stage business paled in comparison to his dancing. He was the Scott Hamilton of the stage. Even if his face had been made of stone, you could not miss how every step was loaded with joy. He understood and blended with the music so perfectly, that I had a hard time separating the two some of the time. His pink lady partner danced very well also. She had an innocence and yet intelligence about her dancing that was refreshing, which made her blend with the bald guy nicely.
The wild orange haired gal was a power house with expression not only in her “vocalizations”, but in every movement, every part of her, down to her calf muscles, if there is such a thing. Oh, a funny thing happened while she was dancing. Seated in front of us was a man in his early 70’s I’d say. While she was dancing with one of her many partners, she fell, on purpose, sideways. Her partner caught her just inches from the floor in a dramatic section of their dance. It made the man in front of us jump in his seat and let out a jolt of sound...tickled me so.
The last dancer I will detail is the young Asian gal. Her dancing style was different from everyone else. She didn’t dance like a woman, but danced more like a girl. Not in technique, mind you, as it was flawless, but in body movement and style. Her movements were not fluid like the music, but more jerky. And although it did not match the rest of the cast, or really the smoothness of the music, I found it delightful. I welcomed the difference and appreciated her characterization and happiness that bubbled over into everything she did.
The short red haired gal and her burly partner deserve an honorable mention as they were perfectly matched in maturity, fluidity, body lines, and sheer physical strength, and the young rejected guy who danced with the wild orange haired gal, trying to win her attention, was delightful to watch in that he did a great job with his character in looking so awkward and young.
So was it worth it? The music was fantastic and well worth the visit. The dancing was superb and well worth the visit. The choreography was generally very good, but because of the porn scene, you shouldn’t take children to see this musical. Take that one song out and you have a superior show. So economically speaking, the Alliance just limited their audience and consequently their revenue. Would I recommend this to my friends? Unfortunately, more than likely not. Especially those with children.
Recent Comments